* Herbert Xu | 2007-11-11 09:18:56 [+0800]:
>On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 10:20:00PM +0100, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
>> * Herbert Xu | 2007-11-10 19:19:55 [+0800]:
>>
>> >On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 11:05:03AM +0100, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
>> >>
>> >> static struct crypto_alg aes_alg = {
>> >> - .cra_name = "aes",
>> >> - .cra_driver_name = "aes-x86_64",
>> >> + .cra_name = "aes",
>> >> + .cra_driver_name = "aes-asm",
>> >
>> >This is bad because the algorithm name no longer matches the module
>> >name.
>> This is case for every aes driver after I renamed them. Or am I missing
>> something? You are not talking about cra_drive_name are you?
>
>I meant the cra_driver_name. Both names can be used to find
>the algorithm.
I checked it and cra_driver_name is only used for compare. I think you
could use something like "cbc(aes-asm)" but this would only work on x86.
Is there something I am overlooking?
I have no problem with adding another alias but atleast I would like
understand it :)
>
>Thanks,
Sebastian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
