On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:35:00AM +0100, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
>
> I checked it and cra_driver_name is only used for compare. I think you
> could use something like "cbc(aes-asm)" but this would only work on x86.
> Is there something I am overlooking?

That's the whole point of cra_driver_name.  Consider the case
of someone who has a higher priority version of AES available,
e.g., padlock or an async device.  If they want to specify the
assembly version of AES then they would use cbc(aes-asm).  Just
as they would use cbc(aes-generic) to select the C version.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to