On 3/4/21 12:28 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 11:07:59AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
From: Saulo Alessandre <saulo.alessan...@tse.jus.br>

* crypto/ecc_curve_defs.h
   - add nist_p384 params

* include/crypto/ecdh.h
   - add ECC_CURVE_NIST_P384

Signed-off-by: Saulo Alessandre <saulo.alessan...@tse.jus.br>
Tested-by: Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.ibm.com>
  crypto/ecc_curve_defs.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  include/crypto/ecdh.h   |  1 +
  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
Can you reorder the patches so that the crypto patches come first
and then I can apply them?

Yes, sounds good.

Are you going to take the other patches as well, except for maybe 9/9, which depends on Nayan's patch series. Mimi suggested to me to ask you whether you could create a topic branch where we can apply other patches to, such as Nayna's?

The NIST P384 patch temporarily introduces this warning, which goes away when the immediately following patch (current 7/9) is applied. Is this an issue or should I squash Saulo's patches or put the top hunk from 7/9 into 6/9?

In file included from crypto/ecc.c:38:
crypto/ecc_curve_defs.h:76:25: warning: ?nist_p384? defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
   76 | static struct ecc_curve nist_p384 = {
      |                         ^~~~~~~~~



Reply via email to