-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Second question - how much load does everybody see diald putting on the system?
> I've running it on a lowly 486/100, and when suck is doing its thing my load
> average goes spinning up to 7-8. I think suck is responsible for most of this,
> but I do see diald taking 30-40% of the CPU.
While downloading news (at about 2Kbps) I saw less than 1% CPU usage by diald
and 20% CPU usage by dctrl (with an AMD 486 DX4/100).
With the link down dctrl goes to 10%.
The freeze I experienced with dctrl that I spoke about in another message, is
due to this error:
bgerror failed to handle background error.
Original error: too many nested calls to Tcl_EvalObj (infinite loop?)
Error in bgerror: error while autoloading "bgerror": too many nested calls
o Tcl_EvalObj (infinite loop?)
maybe my machine is just too slow for the new dctrl?
(just checked: old dctrl with the link down only consumes 3% of CPU and less than 10%
with the link up)
- --
Luca Olivetti http://www.luca.ddns.org
UNETE A LA HUELGA EUROPEA DE INTERNET - EL 31 DE ENERO NO TE CONECTES
JOIN THE EUROPEAN INTERNET STRIKE - DON'T CONNECT ON JANUARY 31st
- ------------------[ http://www.internautas.org ]---------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v0.9.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE2rhfVCQPXTRx9NmQRAma7AJ9iSmM9+mqEoStyjX6sRyGYduGXwwCfSBMr
Ql2DOSvnBZ3cQTZa2qjnbFY=
=Xo5e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
