> > > > This breaks existing XFS filesystems. > > I don't think so. My suggestion would be this: All user EAs are prefixed > with "user." when passed to the kernel. The prefix is not actually stored > on the filesystem. Likewise, all root EAs are prefixed with "root.". OK, that will fly, you and Stephen are really saying the same thing only your interface encodes the info into a single string and Stephen breaks it into two fields. Steve > > Andreas. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Andreas Gruenbacher, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Contact information: http://www.bestbits.at/~ag/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attributes for Po... Andreas Gruenbacher
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attributes for Po... Curtis Anderson
- Re: [Openxdsm-devel] Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended ... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attributes for Posix security ... lord
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attributes for Posix secu... Andreas Gruenbacher
- Re: [Openxdsm-devel] Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended ... Ragnar Kj�rstad
- Re: [Openxdsm-devel] Re: [PROPOSAL] Exten... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [Openxdsm-devel] Re: [PROPOSAL] E... Andreas Gruenbacher
- RE: [Openxdsm-devel] Re: [PROPOS... Peter J. Braam
- RE: [Openxdsm-devel] Re: [PR... Andreas Gruenbacher
- Re: [Openxdsm-devel] Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attribute... lord
- Re: [Openxdsm-devel] Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attr... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attributes for Posix security ... Robert Watson
