Hi, On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 05:32:58PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > OK, that will fly, you and Stephen are really saying the same thing > only your interface encodes the info into a single string and Stephen > breaks it into two fields. Yep, I'm agreeing with Andreas on this, and I don't mind too much how we encode the information --- the two fields makes more sense to me than inventing random pseudo-names for the prefixes, but I'm not too bothered how we do it in the end. --Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attributes for Po... Curtis Anderson
- Re: [Openxdsm-devel] Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended ... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attributes for Posix security ... lord
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attributes for Posix secu... Andreas Gruenbacher
- Re: [Openxdsm-devel] Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended ... Ragnar Kj�rstad
- Re: [Openxdsm-devel] Re: [PROPOSAL] Exten... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [Openxdsm-devel] Re: [PROPOSAL] E... Andreas Gruenbacher
- RE: [Openxdsm-devel] Re: [PROPOS... Peter J. Braam
- RE: [Openxdsm-devel] Re: [PR... Andreas Gruenbacher
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attributes for Posix security ... lord
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attributes for Posix secu... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Extended attributes for Posix security ... Robert Watson
