Re: 64-bit inode numbers (was: glibc 2.1.96)

[H. Peter Anvin]

Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> 
> "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > Sorry for being picky, but LFS, specifically, means using an heterogenous
> > API using seek64() instead of lseek() and so on and so forth.
> 
> Wrong.  LFS also includes -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 which transparently
> replaces the non-LFS types and functions.
> 

Fair enough.  However, the question still remains if we should make it
the default and make the old heterogenous API the explicit option.

        -hpa

-- 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]