Re: 64-bit inode numbers (was: glibc 2.1.96)

[Alexander Viro]

On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> UTF-16 is utter crap, anyway.  UTF-8 or UCS-4/UTF-32 are the only sane
> encodings of Unicode (one multibyte, one wide.  UTF-16 combines the
> advantages of neither and the disadvantages of both.)

No arguments. I would prefer UTF-8 - much easier to switch from ASCII.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]