Alexander Viro writes:
>
>
> On Sat, 10 Jun 2000, Richard Gooch wrote:
>
> > Yeah, sure. I did say "for example". Your format looks fine. One
> > question: is the mount ID really needed? Can't you distinguish based
> > on what FS you're mounting (and mountpoint root)?
>
> First of all, interface is simpler that way.
Will it really make much difference? What would be harder to do
without mount IDs? And how much harder?
> And then... consider the situation when root logs in and decides to
> mess with luser's namespace.
What about it?
Avoiding numbers is a good thing. They have no intrinsic meaning.
Regards,
Richard....
Permanent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current: [EMAIL PROTECTED]