Alexander Viro writes:
> 
> 
> On Sat, 10 Jun 2000, Richard Gooch wrote:
> 
> > Yeah, sure. I did say "for example". Your format looks fine. One
> > question: is the mount ID really needed? Can't you distinguish based
> > on what FS you're mounting (and mountpoint root)?
> 
> First of all, interface is simpler that way.

Will it really make much difference? What would be harder to do
without mount IDs? And how much harder?

> And then... consider the situation when root logs in and decides to
> mess with luser's namespace.

What about it?

Avoiding numbers is a good thing. They have no intrinsic meaning.

                                Regards,

                                        Richard....
Permanent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to