Hi, On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:58:39PM +1200, Ivan wrote: > On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 00:24 +0200, Andreas Kurz wrote: > > You mean: you configured one clone resource for every rilo device and > > there runs a clone on every node except the one it controlls? ... then it > > should have worked ... if not: log files and your cib would be handy. > > > > I think there was even a post of Dejan to the list ... some times ago.. > > that said it is also save to run a stonith script on the node it controlls > > as a node does not stonith itself. > > Sorry to join in without providing real help on the subject. > > Does it have to be a clone resource at all? I configured a colocation > constraint that the resource cannot run on the host which it should > control even if it's safe on itself simply because it has nothing to do > there.
That's fine. > I guess regardless how many nodes I have only 1 needs to have the "key" > STONITH to shot the failing node in the head and it doesn't have to be > the DC or anything. Right. > Hmmm... I didn't test mine at all, I better test it asap then... You should always test as much as humanly possible on your cluster. But testing stonith is definitely a requirement. Thanks, Dejan > Thanks, > Ivan > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
