Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-03-22T19:34:35, [email protected] wrote:
linux-ha CVS committal
Author : panjiam
Host :
Project : linux-ha
Module : cts
Dir : linux-ha/cts
Modified Files:
Makefile.am
Added Files:
OCFDummy2.in LSBDummy.in
Log Message:
added 2 dummy RAs for CTS testing
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/linux-ha/linux-ha/cts/Makefile.am,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -3 -r1.10 -r1.11
--- Makefile.am 27 Feb 2006 09:19:42 -0000 1.10
+++ Makefile.am 23 Mar 2006 02:34:35 -0000 1.11
@@ -35,3 +35,10 @@
CIB.py
hard_DATA = README
+
+ocfdir = $(OCF_RA_DIR)/heartbeat/
+ocf_SCRIPTS = OCFDummy2
+
+lsbdir = /etc/init.d/
+lsb_SCRIPTS = LSBDummy
+
We already have an ocf "Dummy" resource, why you're not using that?
And you're hardcoding the path to the init scripts; that's broken.
Besides, installing an LSB init script as part of the regular install is
not allowed; please split this off into a separate -cts subpackage.
About this:
Jiang Dong told me lrmd was able to accept the full pathname of a RA, in
which case
lrmd run the pathname directly rather than make up its pathname first.
Maybe i can just leave these two RAs in the cts directory and write
their full pathnames
in the CTS-generated cib file. In this way i do not need to install
these RAs.
Split cts info a separate subpackage may be our long term goal.
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
