On Mar 27, 2006, at 4:21 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2006-03-27T16:08:16, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd also like to know why the "type" is set to a fully qualified path
AND why the OCF plugin allowed it.
Surely thats not legal syntax.
Well, that allows one to override the automatic pathname completion in
case the RA / init script gets installed in some non-std place, and is
not explicitly forbidden by the specs, so that makes sense - if no
relative pathname is specified, treat it as an absolute one... That's
definetely harmless.
OCF has the provider subdirectories and the location of the scripts
is part of the standard IIRC... i really see no need for this ability.
--
Andrew Beekhof
"No means no, and no means yes, and everything in between and all the
rest" - TISM
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
