On Jun 13, 2006, at 12:34 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
Log Message: Work-around bug #1287: GUI currently requires empty groups to be allowed.
The GUI may like to use empty groups, but it does not *require* them. And I thought we agreed that this change should not be made in CVS.
Sigh. Yes. See the other mail I sent to the list yesterday.
I'm hopeful that we can get the re-architected GUI ready in time for 2.0.6. But, maybe we'll have to wait with that post 2.0.6, because we've other bugs to chase.
The workflow in the GUI w/o empty groups is so unuseable that I'd rather have empty groups back in the short-term,
ok, i didnt realize it was so horrible. my understanding was that instead of choosing an existing group from the drop-down, one just typed a new group name instead (which honestly didn't seem so horrible to me). and then fix it properly for all complex objects shortly thereafter.
But, for the time being, this is the cheapest way of getting it at least partly useable.
I understand. My concern is that now this change is in CVS a "works for me" mindset will be adopted. -- Andrew Beekhof
"Would the last person to leave please turn out the enlightenment?" - TISM |
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
