On 2006-06-13T05:35:07, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Sigh. Yes. See the other mail I sent to the list yesterday.
> >
> >I'm hopeful that we can get the re-architected GUI ready in time for
> >2.0.6. But, maybe we'll have to wait with that post 2.0.6, because we've
> >other bugs to chase.
> >
> I have been directed to ONLY fix high priority bugs, and to avoid high
> risk changes. And, oh yeah, it's you that wanted me to redirect my
> staff this way.
> Redesigning the GUI is not critical or blocker priority, and it is
> definitely high risk.
Right. If you read the above, you'll see that I'm assuming that it'll
wait post-2.0.6, because we're doing more important work now.
I _am_ allowed to hope, right? ;-) But, you'll notice that this thread
started out with me committing the change to relax the DTD for empty
groups, so that we can keep doing it this way for the time being. ie:
short-term work-around vs mid-term hope.
The problem with trying to mediate between Andrew and you is that I now
end up being hit by both of you. *sigh* ;-)
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée
--
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business -- Charles Darwin
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
