On 2006-08-08T05:42:34, [email protected] wrote:
> + + KNOWN BUGS:
> + - When running a cluster of nodes of very different speeds temporary
> + membership anomalies may occasionally be seen. These correct
> + themselves and don't appear to be harmful. They typically
> + include a message something like this:
> + WARN: Ignoring HA message (op=vote) from XXX: not in our membership
> list
Hi, I think that for a known bug, we ought to reference the
corresponding bugzilla entry, so people can track the progress of this
one.
But, honestly, we got any number of open bugs (though with confusing
version numbers in bugzilla - I _still_ haven't heard back as to how
we're supposed to be using this...) - I'd rather include a link to a
bugzilla search, and only list the non-harmless known bugs.
Otherwise, that list is going to get fairly large.
Sincerely,
Lars
--
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business -- Charles Darwin
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
