On 2006-08-15T09:43:47, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> + + KNOWN BUGS:
> >> + - When running a cluster of nodes of very different speeds temporary
> >> + membership anomalies may occasionally be seen. These correct
> >> + themselves and don't appear to be harmful. They typically
> >> + include a message something like this:
> >> + WARN: Ignoring HA message (op=vote) from XXX: not in our membership
> >> list
> >
> > Hi, I think that for a known bug, we ought to reference the
> > corresponding bugzilla entry, so people can track the progress of this
> > one.
> >
> > But, honestly, we got any number of open bugs (though with confusing
> > version numbers in bugzilla - I _still_ haven't heard back as to how
> > we're supposed to be using this...) - I'd rather include a link to a
> > bugzilla search, and only list the non-harmless known bugs.
> >
> > Otherwise, that list is going to get fairly large.
>
> I noted this one because it's a real bug, and it really happens in
> testing. I didn't reference the bugzillas because I think they're more
> confusing than helpful.
I was mostly asking about the bugzilla number because I couldn't find it
myself.
> Lots of the others either don't ever happen during tests, or they're
> enhancements from some point of view.
Then, they ought to be classified as enhancements in bugzilla, or have
an appropriately low severity, right? ;-)
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée
--
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business -- Charles Darwin
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
