On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-04-11T13:55:04, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > As Lars mentioned yesterday, the reason for 2.1.4 is to allow time for some
> > additional project changes (both managerial and technical).
> >
> > Part of these changes are to split the, currently monolithic, Heartbeat
> > project into logical components that can be updated/released/replaced
> > independently of the other pieces.
> >
> > The current plan is to have 4 pieces (Two of which already exist. All
> > names are suggestions only).
> > In order of build sequence, they are:
> > * heartbeat-core
> > * heartbeat-stack
> > * pacemaker
> > * cluster-extras
>
> For consistency, I'd suggest to name them
> linux-ha-{core,heartbeat,pacemaker,mgmt}, instead of jumping all over
> the place with the names ;-)
>
> (We could shorten linux-ha- to lha-, but why hurt the brand?)
Lots of '-'s in there, but I don't mind too much
Except for pacemaker, which wont be adopting either form of the prefix.
> > * heartbeat-core (alternate name: cluster-core, lha-core)
> > This project would contain all the pieces relevant to the operation of a
> > single node.
> > Conceptually, the project would include:
> > - clplumbing (including logging)
> > - pils
>
> We might even merge these two into "plumbing".
I see you're already into naming the packages :-)
> > - lrm
> > - resource agents
> > - stonith plugins + cli
>
> I agree.
>
> linux-ha-core-{plumbing,lrm,ra,stonith}
fair enough
>
> > * heartbeat-stack
>
> I prefer linux-ha-heartbeat.
> linux-ha-heartbeat; there's some opportunity to split this into v1 and
> v2, but I'm not sure this bit is worth the effort.
agreed
> > The next two projects are already operational and are presented mostly for
> > the sake of completeness.
> >
> >
> > * pacemaker
> > This project contains all the pieces relevant to the v2/CRM/Pacemaker
> > cluster resource manager.
> > Conceptually, the project includes:
> > - cts
> > - crm command line tools
> > - crm (cib, crmd, pengine, tengine, pingd, attrd, OpenAIS plugin)
>
> Does hb_report go here as well and gets renamed to
> cluster_support_report maybe?
makes sense - most of the functionality (i think) is related to
pacemaker and getting it's PE files, configs, etc
dejan?
> linux-ha-pacemaker{,-cts}? Not sure about splitting off CTS, actually,
> but worth a thought. Don't see anything else here which could sanely be
> split-off.
Just "pacemaker". You're getting a bit carried away with the prefix there :-)
And I agree that there is limited value in splitting off CTS -
especially if we're going to advocate its use more and more.
> in the packag
>
>
> > * cluster-extras (currently known as pygui which isn't the best name)
> > This project contains high-level management tools and infrastructure.
> > Conceptually, the project includes:
> > - mgmtd
> > - cim
> > - snmp
> > - tsa_plugin
> > - gui (client)
>
> linux-ha-mgmt-{daemon,cim,snmp,tsa,gui1}
s/linux-ha/cluster/ ?
> (I suggest "gui1" or something similar as I expect we'd have several new
> GUIs in the future.)
gui1 looks horrid
how about pygui (since its written in python) ?
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
