On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:16:36PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2008-08-19T23:13:25, Simon Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm fine with all of this. Though I wonder if it might be best > > to get 3.0.0 out the door before worrying about splitting up the packages. > > Uhm, but that's the whole point of 3.0.x. ;-) > > What release goals for 3.0.0 do you have in mind?
Sorry, I think there is a missunderstanding here. I realise that the whole point of 3.0.0 is to produce a lha release that depends on pacemaker. When I read your email I thought that you were talking about further splitting up what is left of lha into smaller packages. But I now realise that you were just referring to the lha/pacemaker division. So your plan sounds good to me :-) _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
