On 2008-08-20T16:33:44, Simon Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I realise that the whole point of 3.0.0 is to produce
> a lha release that depends on pacemaker.
I think you meant the right thing, but the phrasing would be more like
"a lha release which pacemaker can depend on" ;-)
> When I read your email I thought that you were talking about further
> splitting up what is left of lha into smaller packages. But I now
> realise that you were just referring to the lha/pacemaker division.
Well, there were some slightly minor enhancements - such as indeed
splitting off the resource agents. But nothing too major yet; hence the
question of whether somebody saw anything major worth changing with the
package layout.
Changing package layouts is a nuisance for everybody, and so I wanted to
give this some thought again before finalizing the direction.
> So your plan sounds good to me :-)
Thanks!
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
