On 2008-08-20T11:22:25, Wolfram Schlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-19 15:38]:
> > When thinking about splitting the packages, I think a seperate RA package
> > is useful. Most changes are done at the RA level (new versions of supported
> > applications, bug fixes etc.) and the RA's are very useful for other
> > cluster managers or homegrown solutions too. The more people use a certain
> > RA, the more applications and versions will be supported.
> >
> > So a seperate RA package without much dependencies (actually the package
> > can contain all required ocf dependencies) would be nice.
>
> Seconded. Nagios has that as well (nagios-plugins package) and it
> is just a good idea anyway.
Yes, that's actually part of the split.
For the STONITH and RA packages, it would also be interesting to turn
the hard requirements for the libraries & packages they have into
"Recommends:" and "Complements:" ...
> I have created something similar: my own heartbeat-scripts package for
> Gentoo that installs custom OCF RAs (into /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/custom)
> and STONITH plugins (into /usr/lib/stonith/plugins/external/custom):
_custom_ is possibly not the best choice of provider name. ;-)
But yes, clearly we hope to have more independently packaged resource
agents one day; it would be so cool if they were instead shipped with
the service package (and not our problem to maintain! ;-). That's a bit
beyond of what we can do with our package layout though.
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
