Hi Lars, On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 12:30 +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2008-10-06T12:32:11, Yan Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 17:39 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi Xinwei, > > > > > > I understood it. > > > > > > Then I will use latest GUI next week. > > > If there is a problem in GUI, I report it in a mailing list of Pacemaker. > > Any comments or suggestions are welcome;-) > > I think it definetely needs to be renamed to at least "pacemaker-pygui", > the package just being called "pygui" doesn't work. > Yes, definetely. I've renamed it to "pacemaker-pygui" when I added 1.4 revision tag. Actually I don't think "pacemaker-pygui" is ideal either:-) Because it includes the snmp subagent and the backend of the "pygui". Maybe "pacemaker-mgmt" or something is better?
> > It is able to work with pacemaker 0.7 and theoretically with pacemaker > > 0.6 (I haven't tested it yet). > > It supports Relax-NG schemas except DTD , and recognizes different > > versions of CIB xml > > Maybe a new release would be in order then? Yes, I do think so too. We could release it as "2.0" at an appropriate time. > > > There're known problems that I haven't fixed yet. > > * Cannot add attributes or sub-objects for non-existent optional objects > > such as "rsc_defaults " and "op_defaults" > > * Render widgets incorrectly for attributes and elements with "anyName" > > such as the "status" > > * "Start/Stop/Default Run" a resource need to be reimplemented > > Will these be fixed shortly? That would sort-of be really required. Yes, I'll fix them ASAP. > > > TODO: > > * A simple mode for beginners or general uses > > * Widzards for convenience of adding resources > > * Provide detailed information: failed operations, pending operations, > > scores of resources, crm_verify, PE graph... > > * Shadow configuration > > I see. And, of course, calling the crm shell instead of directly > interacting with the CIB ;-) I think maybe we could use the same way as crm shell does to implement them to avoid "fork"ing for times. What do you think? > > Does a roadmap exist for these features? I hope I could fix the previous problems and work out the first two features in two or three weeks, and I really want get the last two features done before releasing SLES 11. Is the middle or end of November OK? Regards, -- Yan Gao China R&D Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell, Inc. SUSE® Linux Enterprise 10 Your Linux is ready http://www.novell.com/linux _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
