Hi, On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 01:30:13PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote: > Hi Lars, > On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 12:30 +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > > On 2008-10-06T12:32:11, Yan Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 17:39 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Hi Xinwei, > > > > > > > > I understood it. > > > > > > > > Then I will use latest GUI next week. > > > > If there is a problem in GUI, I report it in a mailing list of > > > > Pacemaker. > > > ???Any comments or suggestions are welcome;-) > > > > I think it definetely needs to be renamed to at least "pacemaker-pygui", > > the package just being called "pygui" doesn't work. > > > Yes, definetely. I've renamed it to "pacemaker-pygui" when I added 1.4 > revision tag. Actually I don't think "pacemaker-pygui" is ideal > either:-) > Because it includes the snmp subagent and the backend of the "pygui". > Maybe "pacemaker-mgmt" or something is better?
-mgmt sounds good to me. It would also be good if the gui is in a separate package, because of numerous dependencies which typically aren't needed on cluster nodes (e.g. gtk stuff). Thanks, Dejan _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
