On Oct 7, 2008, at 1:28 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 01:30:13PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote:
Hi Lars,
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 12:30 +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2008-10-06T12:32:11, Yan Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 17:39 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Xinwei,
I understood it.
Then I will use latest GUI next week.
If there is a problem in GUI, I report it in a mailing list of
Pacemaker.
???Any comments or suggestions are welcome;-)
I think it definetely needs to be renamed to at least "pacemaker-
pygui",
the package just being called "pygui" doesn't work.
Yes, definetely. I've renamed it to "pacemaker-pygui" when I added
1.4
revision tag. Actually I don't think "pacemaker-pygui" is ideal
either:-)
Because it includes the snmp subagent and the backend of the "pygui".
Maybe "pacemaker-mgmt" or something is better?
-mgmt sounds good to me. It would also be good if the gui is
in a separate package, because of numerous dependencies which
typically aren't needed on cluster nodes (e.g. gtk stuff).
agreed on both counts
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
