On 2009-09-16 18:11, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: >> Not sure, but I don't think so. I think it's up to the RA to >> interpret it at will. At any rate, multiple depths may be >> supported. > > Yes, it's not defined anywhere.
Thought so. :)
>>> It does. I just thought it would be helpful to see the node name in there.
>> You can then set the default to: .`uname`.${OCF_RESOURCE_INSTANCE}.
>
> That isn't a good default. It'd end up cluttering the fs eventually, as
> nothing exists to clean it up.
Really?
http://hg.linux-ha.org/agents/file/f8bc24bc1db4/heartbeat/Filesystem#l671
> I'd suggest conv=fdatasync/fsync instead of flag=direct.
The other Lars suggested that as well. :) But what about reads? Is there
any filesystem-agnostic way of saying "I want to read what's on disk,
rather than in cache" that's actually _better_ than opening the file
with O_DIRECT (realizing that it's a no-op for some filesystems)?
Cheers,
Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
