On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:20 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Developers of Heartbeat, > > When we combined Pacemaker with Heartbeat, we understand that Quorum control > does not work well. > > For example, it occurs when a cluster consisted of plural nodes when I set it > besides > no-quorum-policy=ignore. > > We know that this is considerably always the problem that was already known. > > The problem occurs by the difference of the timing of the detection when a > node was divided. > > We think that there is the problem in Heartbeat. > * There may be the problem in CCM. > * Because the reason is because the problem does not occur when it combined > Pacemaker with corosync > to notify of node division definitely. > > Our many users are going to use the Quorum control in Heartbeat. > > Heartbeat has to notify pacemaker of a change of right node constitution like > corosync. > > Is there the plan when Quorum control of Heartbeat becomes right?
I doubt it, I think development on heartbeat is at an end and maintenance is limited to regressions. But maybe lge would like to comment further. _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
