On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2010-08-27T09:53:32, Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > However, it is very difficult for us to wait for corosync to be stable. >> Its pretty close these days. >> It does lack ucast and bcast support, but there are plans to address >> that outside of corosync. > > The current corosync is really quite stable, certainly as stable as CCM. > If it isn't, there's at least someone we can ask for active help. > > bcast is handled by corosync, by the way; and unicast support may also > be coming. > > I'm curious what you mean by "outside of corosync", though - how would > the network protocol be addressed outside of corosync?
http://www.linuxplumbersconf.org/2010/ocw/proposals/1065 Basically its intended to be a generically useful layer sitting underneath corosync. Steve was skeptical at first but is apparently on board with the idea now - to the point where its the preferred approach for providing ucast capabilities. _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
