On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:12 AM, <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Thank you for comment. > >> I doubt it, I think development on heartbeat is at an end and >> maintenance is limited to regressions. > > We understand it enough.
The biggest problem is that none of us actually understand the CCM. I looked at it once a long time ago and I've never been so frightened in my life. But there's nothing stoping someone at NTT becoming a CCM expert ;-) > However, it is very difficult for us to wait for corosync to be stable. Its pretty close these days. It does lack ucast and bcast support, but there are plans to address that outside of corosync. > >> But maybe lge would like to comment further. > > Well. > Let's wait for more comment..... > > Best Regards, > > --- Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 3:20 AM, <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp> wrote: >> > Hi Developers of Heartbeat, >> > >> > When we combined Pacemaker with Heartbeat, we understand that Quorum >> > control does not work >> well. >> > >> > For example, it occurs when a cluster consisted of plural nodes when I set >> > it besides >> > no-quorum-policy=ignore. >> > >> > We know that this is considerably always the problem that was already >> > known. >> > >> > The problem occurs by the difference of the timing of the detection when a >> > node was divided. >> > >> > We think that there is the problem in Heartbeat. >> > �* There may be the problem in CCM. >> > �* Because the reason is because the problem does not occur when it >> > combined Pacemaker with >> corosync >> > to notify of node division definitely. >> > >> > Our many users are going to use the Quorum control in Heartbeat. >> > >> > Heartbeat has to notify pacemaker of a change of right node constitution >> > like corosync. >> > >> > Is there the plan when Quorum control of Heartbeat becomes right? >> >> I doubt it, I think development on heartbeat is at an end and >> maintenance is limited to regressions. >> But maybe lge would like to comment further. >> _______________________________________________________ >> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev >> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ >> > > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
