On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 02:55:52PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2012-04-04T01:52:12, Christian Franke <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello Florian, > > > > Your question is fully justified - I sincerely apologize for ignoring > > that comprehensive documentation. > > > > I rewrote the patch trying to adhere to the requirements given in the > > documentation. > > Hi Christian, > > that patch shares a *lot* of code with IPaddr(2), doesn't it?
If so (didn't look yet at the code) ... > I wonder if that wouldn't benefit from refactoring, moving shared > functions to an include? ... I'm all for that. Cheers, Dejan > Regards, > Lars > > -- > Architect Storage/HA > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, > HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde > > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
