Hi Christian, On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 06:00:45PM +0200, Christian Franke wrote: > On 04/04/2012 02:55 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > > that patch shares a *lot* of code with IPaddr(2), doesn't it? > > > > I wonder if that wouldn't benefit from refactoring, moving shared > > functions to an include? > > Thanks for your feedback, I will have a look at that - the gratuitous > arp and also some paramter parsing are somewhat shared, although the > exact requirements tend to differ in subtle ways when proxyarp and > IPaddr2 are compared. > > I currently wonder how to test the Functionality of IPaddr2, as it is > quite complex as soon as it comes to cluster IP. > > (In short: is there a somewhat self contained and exhaustive test for > all possible operations and configurations of IPaddr2? The ocft does not > seem to cut it for that, if I am not mistaken)
You're not mistaken and no, there's currently no such thing. Cheers, Dejan > Best Regards, > Christian Franke > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
