On 5/15/07, Serge Dubrouski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew, you used to periodically update the stable Mercury repositary but it looks like you aren;t doing this anymore. Why?
I assume you mean: http://hg.linux-ha.org/heartbeat Its not been updated because there has been no release to update it from.
Putting HB built from development version into production isn't an appropriate solution,
What is a released version if not a development version thats passed some testing hurdle? The problem here, is that the version in question was certified by SUSE for SLES users and there was no corresponding official community release. What is available though, is binaries for fedora, debian as well as a number of older SUSE platforms built from the same source at: http://software.opensuse.org/download/server:/ha-clustering/ I've also been campaigning for the ability to build for other archs+distro combinations, but this is a work in progress.
using 2.0.8 as you siad isn;t a good way too and there is no current stable build anymore.
go back and look at the first line of my initial response. its not a situation i'm particularly happy about either but we hope to have the situation rectified "soon".
On 5/15/07, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/15/07, Benjamin Watine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > > > > I'm about to install Heartbeat on a fresh Debian 4 system, and I was > > wondering wich version of heartbeat I should install ? > > Some bugs have been corrected since v2.0.8, and I would like to install > > these corrections too. So should I install v2.0.8 and apply the patches > > that I want, or install the latest development version ? > > > > If you think there's no major problem installing latest snapshot, where > > can I find it ? here ? : http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/archive/tip.tar.bz2 > > Any other version to suggest ? > > A question with a rather unsatisfactory answer I'm afraid. > > I wouldn't recommend 2.0.8 - both due to its age and some rather > unpleasant bugs and memory leaks it contained. > > But I also wouldn't recommend the latest snapshot either as the lrmd > is in a rather sorry state. > > The link posted by Sam is probably the best bet for pre-built > packages. Otherwise, if one is comfortable with building from > scratch, I would use: > > http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/archive/SLE10-SP1.tar.bz2 > > which is what will be going into SLES10, SP1 and was the subject of a > respectable amount of testing. > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Benjamin > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-HA mailing list > > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
