Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
On 10/23/07, Riccardo Perni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On 10/22/07, Riccardo Perni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Is it possible
>> >> to handle this situation?
>> >
>> > You may try quorumd. See
>> >
>> > http://www.linux-ha.org/QuorumServerGuide
>>
>> I'm going to look at it, but is'n it another SPOF?
>
> by definition, no.
> because you've already had at least one failure before quorumd
> becomes relevant
Do you mean that the cluster will continue to work even if I have a
failure on the quorum server?
my understanding is that the quorum server is not used unless you
already dont have quorum... at which point you've lost half your nodes
anyway
Uhm, but at this point I already have a split-brain condition... or not?
--
Riccardo Perni
Unità Operativa Informatica Aziendale
ASL Roma-B
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
