Riccardo Perni schrieb: > > > Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > >> On 10/22/07, Riccardo Perni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >> Is it possible >>> >> to handle this situation? >>> > >>> > You may try quorumd. See >>> > >>> > http://www.linux-ha.org/QuorumServerGuide >>> >>> I'm going to look at it, but is'n it another SPOF? >> >> by definition, no. >> because you've already had at least one failure before quorumd >> becomes relevant > > Do you mean that the cluster will continue to work even if I have a > failure on the quorum server?
yes exactly, the cluster continues to work, if (in your case) both nodes are up and running. A double failer like quorum server down and one node down will result in a "no service" state. But thats even better than running a service twice, if it not designed to run on more than one node. > > >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >> >> > > --Riccardo Perni > Unità Operativa Informatica Aziendale > ASL Roma-B > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
