[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Riccardo Perni schrieb:
Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
On 10/22/07, Riccardo Perni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is it possible
>> to handle this situation?
>
> You may try quorumd. See
>
> http://www.linux-ha.org/QuorumServerGuide
I'm going to look at it, but is'n it another SPOF?
by definition, no.
because you've already had at least one failure before quorumd
becomes relevant
Do you mean that the cluster will continue to work even if I have a
failure on the quorum server?
yes exactly, the cluster continues to work, if (in your case) both nodes
are up and running. A double failer like quorum server down and one node
down will result in a "no service" state.
But thats even better than running a service twice, if it not designed
to run on more than one node.
Well this seems the way to go then! thanks to you, Fabian and Andreas
--
Riccardo Perni
Unità Operativa Informatica Aziendale
ASL Roma-B
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
