Thanks all. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Beekhof Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 2:33 PM To: General Linux-HA mailing list Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] moving resource to "unmanaged"
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Andreas Mock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Alon, > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Alon Lubin > > Gesendet: Montag, 28. April 2008 08:18 > > An: [email protected] > > Betreff: [Linux-HA] moving resource to "unmanaged" > > > > > I noticed that although the resource is "unmanaged", after I stop the > > resource, the fail count is increased by 1, no matter how > > much time I wait > > before stopping the resource, or how long the resource is actually > > stopped. > > > I'm pretty sure that unmanaged does not mean unmonitored. I fell into that pitfall either. > That means: Failcount increases. I can't explain why the behaviour is implemented as such. Unmanaged was intended for things on which the cluster might depend but not be able to control. So you'd still want to know if the things you depend on are running or not > > Your procedure has to be: > * Stop monitor action (set to disabled) > * Set resource unmanaged > * Stop resource > > Best regards > Andreas Mock > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
