> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: General Linux-HA mailing list <[email protected]> > Gesendet: 28.04.08 13:34:30 > An: "General Linux-HA mailing list" <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] moving resource to "unmanaged" > > I'm pretty sure that unmanaged does not mean unmonitored. I fell into that > > pitfall either. > > That means: Failcount increases. I can't explain why the behaviour is > > implemented as such. > > Unmanaged was intended for things on which the cluster might depend > but not be able to control. > So you'd still want to know if the things you depend on are running or not
Hi Andrew, thank you for the explanation. Best regards Andreas Mock _________________________________________________________________________ In 5 Schritten zur eigenen Homepage. Jetzt Domain sichern und gestalten! Nur 3,99 EUR/Monat! http://www.maildomain.web.de/?mc=021114 _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
