> > Ah ok, sorry just wanted to make sure the intended functionality was > clear. > > I had a look at the report and analysis.txt highlights the problem quite > well: > > > > pengine[20727]: 2008/06/23_11:02:40 ERROR: unpack_rsc_op: Hard error: > > prmApPostgreSQLDB_fail_60000 failed with rc=2. > > pengine[20727]: 2008/06/23_11:02:40 ERROR: unpack_rsc_op: Preventing > > prmApPostgreSQLDB from re-starting anywhere in the cluster > > > > It looks like the RA (incorrectly) returned 2 (invalid parameter), > > instead of 3 (unimplemented function). > > rc=2 tells the cluster that the configuration is invalid and not to > > bother starting the resource elsewhere. > > !!! that means, there might be a problem at pgsql RA?
hb_report-with-pgsql/x3650b/ha-log/txt line 1118: crmd[4109]: 2008/06/20_16:21:38 info: process_lrm_event: LRM operation prmApPostgreSQLDB_monitor_0 (call=6, rc=7, cib-update=30, confirmed=true) complete It seems that return code is "7" at this time. line 1200: crmd[4109]: 2008/06/20_16:24:40 info: process_graph_event: Action prmApPostgreSQLDB_fail_60000 (0:2;0:0:crm-resource-4265) initiated by a different transitioner line 1202: crmd[4109]: 2008/06/20_16:24:40 WARN: update_failcount: Updating failcount for prmApPostgreSQLDB on 6f0ddbd3-848d-483b-805e-42612af62e64 after failed fail: rc=2 (update=value++, time=1213946680) is this "rc" equal as "rc" in line 1118? Thanks, Junko _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
