On Jun 25, 2008, at 8:28 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
So there is no need for an RA to support "fail" operation? Then
why it
is gets called with it?
precisely because it doesn't support it - to get an error.
Sounds like we are going round. What would support for that "fail"
operation mean on RA level? What is RA supposed to to when it's called
with a "fail" operation besides answering that it's not yet
implemented?
it should return the same thing that it should when called with
idontsupportthisaction or abcdefg or fred
2
as in "not supported"
It looks like I'm loosing and whole point of that "fail" operations.
What do you mean by an "asynchronous" fail?
--
Serge Dubrouski.
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
--
Serge Dubrouski.
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
