>> >> So there is no need for an RA to support "fail" operation? Then why it >> is gets called with it? > > precisely because it doesn't support it - to get an error.
Sounds like we are going round. What would support for that "fail" operation mean on RA level? What is RA supposed to to when it's called with a "fail" operation besides answering that it's not yet implemented? > >> It looks like I'm loosing and whole point of that "fail" operations. >> What do you mean by an "asynchronous" fail? >> >> -- >> Serge Dubrouski. >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >> > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > -- Serge Dubrouski. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
