On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 7:05 PM, daniel peess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi there,
>
> goal:
> several groups shall never run on the same node and never influence each 
> other.

If I understand you right, each group has to run on its own node and
should never run together with another group on one node .... so where
should a resource fail over to in case of a node failure? Isn't then
the cluster "overhead" obsolete without an additional standby node?

Regards,
Andreas

>
> example: 3 nodes, 3 groups, 3 colocation constraints.
> - colocation constraints are all '-infinity'.
>  group_1 --> group_2, group_1 --> group_3, group_2 --> group_3.
> - if you crash/standby/stop the node that is running group_1,
>  no other group is affected, OK.
> - if you crash/standby/stop the node that is running group_2,
>  group_1 is stopped too and group_2 is run there instead, NOK.
> - if you crash/standby/stop the node that is running group_3,
>  group_1 and group_2 are stopped too
>  and group_2 and group_3 are started again, NOK.
> - if two nodes are active and run group_2 and group_3,
>  and you start the third node, group_2 and group_3 are first stopped
>  and started before starting group_1, NOK.
> - no matter if all colocation constraints are symmetrical 'true' or 'false',
>  the behavior is the same.
>
> i didn't set any order constraints, with them i would expect this behaviour.
> i just don't want to run them together.
> colocation constraints shouldn't define any precedence,
> as priority attributes are used for that, wrong?
>
> bye,
> daniel
>
> --
> It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most 
> intelligent,
> but rather the one most responsive to change. Charles Darwin.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFIj03GOc+x6Qjb4v0RAtRKAKCGhpvrnBhnD6JvjrkKJRExstf34wCglVY0
> SIBRFplFshret1lXBRCSJhg=
> =T+gM
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to