On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:38 AM, daniel peess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi andreas, > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 09:53:22AM +0200, Andreas Kurz wrote: >> If I understand you right, each group has to run on its own node and >> should never run together with another group on one node .... so where >> should a resource fail over to in case of a node failure? Isn't then >> the cluster "overhead" obsolete without an additional standby node? > > if no free node is left it must not fail-over at all unless it has a higher > priority than one of the other active resources. > this was just an example, it still affects those other resources even if > you have a dozen of free nodes left.
Ok .. I see. Try to set the 'default-resource-stickiness' to a positive value and give each of your groups a different 'priority'. That should do the trick. Regards, Andreas > > btw., sles10 sp2 and hb 2.1.3. > > bye, > daniel > > -- > It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most > intelligent, > but rather the one most responsive to change. Charles Darwin. > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
