hi andreas, On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 09:53:22AM +0200, Andreas Kurz wrote: > If I understand you right, each group has to run on its own node and > should never run together with another group on one node .... so where > should a resource fail over to in case of a node failure? Isn't then > the cluster "overhead" obsolete without an additional standby node?
if no free node is left it must not fail-over at all unless it has a higher priority than one of the other active resources. this was just an example, it still affects those other resources even if you have a dozen of free nodes left. btw., sles10 sp2 and hb 2.1.3. bye, daniel -- It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but rather the one most responsive to change. Charles Darwin. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
