Try assigning different udp port for broadcast in both the clusters.

Default port used is #udpport        694

Regards,
Arun.

> From: Devraj Mukherjee <[email protected]>

> Hi all,
>
> I am new to Hearbeat so please be kind :)
>
> I have successfully configure two machines to use heartbeat to cluster
> httpd. The two nodes are called etk-1 and etk-2. I am trying to
> configure another two machines to act as a separate cluster (on the
> same IP subnet). These two nodes are called radu-1 and radu-2.
>
> Obviously being a broadcast protocol radu-1 and radu-2 get these
> messages from etk-1 and I can't seem to get radu-1 and radu-2 to
> cluster (mostly probably because they are not getting the messages
> from the right nodes).
>
> Is it possible to have two sets of clusters in the one IP subnet?
>
> If yes what do I have to change so these clusters don't send messages
> to the wrong nodes.
>
> heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: process_status_message:
> bad node [etk-1] in message
> heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG: Dumping message with 10 
> fields
> heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[0] : [t=NS_ackmsg]
> heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[1] : [dest= etk-2]
> heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[2] : [ackseq=1a9601]
> heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[3] :
> [(1)destuuid=0xdf38de8(37 28)]
> heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[4] : [src= etk-1]
> heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[5] :
> [(1)srcuuid=0xdf39248(36 27)]
> heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[6] : [hg=499a2a65]
> heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[7] : [ts=49cfb452]
> heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[8] : [ttl=3]
>
>
> --
> "The secret impresses no-one, the trick you use it for is everything"
> - Alfred Borden (The Prestiege)
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to