Hi, On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:46:36PM +1100, Devraj Mukherjee wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for response. I changed the udpport and heartbeat still trys to > start on 694. I am using CentOS, does the port number have to be in > any other place apart from ha.cf?
No. What does your ha.cf look like? The directives have to be in certain order (not sure, but I think port first). Thanks, Dejan > Thanks > > heartbeat[1108]: 2009/03/31_22:44:46 info: Configuration validated. > Starting heartbeat 2.1.3 > heartbeat[1109]: 2009/03/31_22:44:46 info: heartbeat: version 2.1.3 > heartbeat[1109]: 2009/03/31_22:44:46 info: Heartbeat generation: 1238347641 > heartbeat[1109]: 2009/03/31_22:44:46 info: glib: UDP Broadcast > heartbeat started on port 694 (694) interface eth0 > heartbeat[1109]: 2009/03/31_22:44:46 info: glib: UDP Broadcast > heartbeat closed on port 694 interface eth0 - Status: 1 > heartbeat[1109]: 2009/03/31_22:44:46 info: G_main_add_TriggerHandler: > Added signal manual handler > heartbeat[1109]: 2009/03/31_22:44:46 info: G_main_add_TriggerHandler: > Added signal manual handler > heartbeat[1109]: 2009/03/31_22:44:46 info: G_main_add_SignalHandler: > Added signal handler for signal 17 > heartbeat[1109]: 2009/03/31_22:44:46 info: Local status now set to: 'up' > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Arun G <[email protected]> wrote: > > Try assigning different udp port for broadcast in both the clusters. > > > > Default port used is #udpport ? ? ? ?694 > > > > Regards, > > Arun. > > > >> From: Devraj Mukherjee <[email protected]> > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I am new to Hearbeat so please be kind :) > >> > >> I have successfully configure two machines to use heartbeat to cluster > >> httpd. The two nodes are called etk-1 and etk-2. I am trying to > >> configure another two machines to act as a separate cluster (on the > >> same IP subnet). These two nodes are called radu-1 and radu-2. > >> > >> Obviously being a broadcast protocol radu-1 and radu-2 get these > >> messages from etk-1 and I can't seem to get radu-1 and radu-2 to > >> cluster (mostly probably because they are not getting the messages > >> from the right nodes). > >> > >> Is it possible to have two sets of clusters in the one IP subnet? > >> > >> If yes what do I have to change so these clusters don't send messages > >> to the wrong nodes. > >> > >> heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: process_status_message: > >> bad node [etk-1] in message > >> heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG: Dumping message with 10 > >> fields > >> heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[0] : [t=NS_ackmsg] > >> heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[1] : [dest= etk-2] > >> heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[2] : [ackseq=1a9601] > >> heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[3] : > >> [(1)destuuid=0xdf38de8(37 28)] > >> heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[4] : [src= etk-1] > >> heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[5] : > >> [(1)srcuuid=0xdf39248(36 27)] > >> heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[6] : [hg=499a2a65] > >> heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[7] : [ts=49cfb452] > >> heartbeat[3745]: 2009/03/30_04:48:02 ERROR: MSG[8] : [ttl=3] > >> > >> > >> -- > >> "The secret impresses no-one, the trick you use it for is everything" > >> - Alfred Borden (The Prestiege) > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-HA mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > > > > > -- > "The secret impresses no-one, the trick you use it for is everything" > - Alfred Borden (The Prestiege) > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
