I see from the ha-log that if the power of the active node did not push back in 2 minutes, the passive node would fail to stonith the active node because of timeout, then the passive node would not stonith the passive node again when the power of the active node pushed back and the stonith daemon would stop so that the stonith on the passive would never work.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 07:59:47PM +0800, fengyandong wrote: > > heartbeat version: 2.1.4 > > Two nodes are configred in active/passive mode with stonith. > > Two quesiont: > > 1 . If the power of active node was pulled out, then pushed in as soon as > > possible, how does the passive node react? > > > > 2. If the power of active node was pulled out, then after some time > pushed > > in, how does the passive node react? > > If the deadtime is shorter than the time the node needs to boot > and start heartbeat, the live node is going to try to fence > (stonith) the rebooting node. The difference between the two > cases is only in timing. Or did I misunderstood your questions? > > Thanks, > > Dejan > > > Any help, > > Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-HA mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
