Yes, if the power of the node is pulled out, the stonith device can not work.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:12:35PM +0800, fengyandong wrote: > > I see from the ha-log that if the power of the active node did not push > back > > in 2 minutes, the passive node would fail to stonith the active node > because > > of timeout, then the passive node would not stonith the passive node > again > > when the power of the active node pushed back and the stonith daemon > would > > stop so that the stonith on the passive would never work. > > /me completely lost :) > > BTW, does you stonith device depend on the node's power? If > that's so, then your scenario is simply not valid. > > Thanks, > > Dejan > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 07:59:47PM +0800, fengyandong wrote: > > > > heartbeat version: 2.1.4 > > > > Two nodes are configred in active/passive mode with stonith. > > > > Two quesiont: > > > > 1 . If the power of active node was pulled out, then pushed in as > soon as > > > > possible, how does the passive node react? > > > > > > > > 2. If the power of active node was pulled out, then after some time > > > pushed > > > > in, how does the passive node react? > > > > > > If the deadtime is shorter than the time the node needs to boot > > > and start heartbeat, the live node is going to try to fence > > > (stonith) the rebooting node. The difference between the two > > > cases is only in timing. Or did I misunderstood your questions? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Dejan > > > > > > > Any help, > > > > Thanks! > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Linux-HA mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Linux-HA mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-HA mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
