Hi, On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 09:39:52AM -0800, Robinson, Eric wrote: > > Well, not my call :) At any rate, test thoroughly your cluster. > > What? You won't take responsibility for this? :-) > > Here's one question about Pacemaker. With my heartbeat R1 clusters, I > have a large number of resources (multiple instances of MySQL), most of > which are not dependent on each other. But since the resource scripts > are run sequentially, it takes a long time (about 3 minutes) to fail > over. With Pacemaker, will the non-dependent resources be managed > concurrently by separate threads, enabling failover to happen faster?
Not threads, but separate processes. Yes, they would run in parallel, by default max four at a time, but that can be tuned. Thanks, Dejan > -- > Eric Robinson > > > Disclaimer - February 11, 2010 > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended > solely for General Linux-HA mailing list. If you are not the named addressee > you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views > or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and might > not represent those of . Warning: Although has taken reasonable precautions > to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept > responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or > attachments. > This disclaimer was added by Policy Patrol: http://www.policypatrol.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
