On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Gianluca Cecchi <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Also, in monitor available fields for a resource there are: >> > >> > - interval, default 0 >> > Does it mean no monitor at all if I don't specify a number different from >> > zero? >> >> No. It means non-recurring. >> > > Sorry but I already read that (from 1.0 and 1.1) and I don't catch the > meaning of non-recurring... > > a) If I don't set at all a monitor line, the only monitor is done at start > with a following status command to see if it has correcltly started, > correct?
no, the only monitor is done when the _node_ starts > And at stop with another folowing status comman to verify this, correct? no > b) If I set a monitor line and set a non-zero interval value, enabled is > true for default and I will have in place the monitor yes > c) If I set a monitor line but I don't write anything for parameter > "interval", it will default to zero, "enabled" is true by default and what > will happen? the only monitor is done when the _node_ starts. you'd only do this to specify a custom timeout for that operation > > >> > time 0 R1 starts >> > time 5 min R1 fails ---> counter begins for failure-timeout and cluster >> > successfully restarts it (in place? Where is it set that restart >> operation >> > has to be tried in place or on the other node? >> >> >> the fact that failcount < threshold >> > > Ok, and I presume the correct way to setup a force failover on another node > as soon as a failure happens for a resource is to set migration-threshold = > 1 ? yes > > >> >> >) ; failcount=1 >> > time 10 min R1 fails again ---> counter resets for failure-timeout and >> > cluster successfully restarts it ; failcount=2 >> > time 25 min R1 has not failed again ---> failcount is reset to 0 and we >> are >> > in similar condition as in time 0 >> >> its not automatically reset to zero in 1.0 >> that is new in 1.1 >> >> > In 1.1 when failcount reached the threshold and the resource failovers to > the other node, is failure-timeout reset again on the first node no. its reset after the 15 minutes > and after > the amount of time (es 15min) will it become again eligible to get the > resource, yes > or do I have to manually set it as able to do that? no _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
