I have pacemaker/corosync installed on a 2 server cluster of CentOS 5.5 boxes. Currently these boxes are setup with an iSCSI SAN volume, OCFS2 file system and pacemaker is configured to manage Apache active/active.
Many of the how to documents I have been following show GFS2 or OCFS2 being managed by pacemaker, though I haven't done this integration yet. I figured I would ask the user community and/or developers what the case is for using pacemaker to manage the cluster aware file systems. Thanks, David _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
