On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:33 AM, David <[email protected]> wrote: > I have pacemaker/corosync installed on a 2 server cluster of CentOS 5.5 > boxes. Currently these boxes are setup with an iSCSI SAN volume, OCFS2 > file system and pacemaker is configured to manage Apache active/active. > > Many of the how to documents I have been following show GFS2 or OCFS2 > being managed by pacemaker, though I haven't done this integration yet. > > I figured I would ask the user community and/or developers what the case > is for using pacemaker to manage the cluster aware file systems.
Same as for any other cluster resource - ordered startup/shutdown and health checks. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
