On Wednesday 11 August 2010 15:12, Igor Chudov wrote: ... > At this point, I am beginning to have my doubts about this whole > heartbeat system and its ability to serve for years, in what looks to > me like simple configuration. ...
Well, that's kinda why I stick to 2.1.4 (also b/c it's a stock rpm on centos) and v1-style config. From back when things were simple stupid. As I understand it, most heartbeat work since was done on v2 features: xml, resource monitoring, corosync, pacemaker... which I'm either not missing (mon works just fine for monitoring) or actively don't want (xml in particular). When I need a 3-node cluster I'll think about those. Until then, 2.1.4 is not perfect but it works well enough. Dima -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
